The difference between height anomaly and geoid height in Vietnam according to the global gravity field model SGG-UGM-2
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/xf70bz07Keywords:
Height anomaly, Geoid height, Difference between geoid and quasigeoidAbstract
The purpose of this study is to determine the difference between height anomaly and geoid height in Vietnam. The formulas for calculating height anomalies, geoid heights and the differences between them have been studied. The experiment was performed in the Vietnam area with latitude limit: 8ºN - 24ºN; longitude: 102ºE - 114ºE with data from the global Earth Gravity Model SGG-UGM-2 and the Terrain Model ETOPO1. The experimental results show that: In the study area, the geoid height increases gradually in the Northwest - Southeast direction, has a negative value in the Northwest, has a positive value in the Southeast, and has a value smaller than the height anomaly. The difference between the height anomaly and the geoid height varies from 0 to 0.445 m, with decimeter-scale values in mountainous areas, centimeter-scale values and smaller in plain areas, and zero over the East Sea. This study provides an understanding of the differences between geoid and quasigeoid in the territory and territorial waters of Vietnam.
Downloads
References
[1] Ismael Foroughi, Petr Vanıcek, Michael Sheng, Robert William Kingdon and Marcelo C. Santos, “In defence of the classical height system”, Geophys J Int 211(2): 1154-61, 2017.
[2] Flury J., and Rummel R., “On the geoid-quasigeoid separation in mountain areas”, Journal of Geodesy, 83:829-847, 2009.
[3] Lars E. Sjöberg, “On the geoid and orthometric height vs.quasigeoid and normal height”, Journal Journal of Geodetic Science, 2018.
[4] Jack McCubbine, Nicholas Brown, Will Featherstone, Mick Filmer, Nicholas Gowans, “Next Generation Height Reference Frame”, Geoscience Australia, Curtin University, NSW Government, Frontiersi.com.au, 2020.
[5] Ismael Foroughi and Robert Tenzer, “Comparison of different methods for estimating the geoid-to-quasigeoid separation”, Geophys J Int 2010: 1001-1020, 2017.
[6] Đỗ Văn Thành, Lê Quốc Hưng, “Xác định mô hình độ cao quasigeoid cho khu vực miền Bắc Việt Nam”, Tạp chí Địa lý và Tài nguyên, 2014.
[7] Nguyễn Hữu Tuyên, “Nghiên cứu xác định mô hình geoid chính xác cao phục vụ chuyển độ cao GPS cho vùng đồng bằng sông Cửu Long”, Luận án tiến sĩ, Trường Đại học Bách khoa TP.HCM, 2018.
[8] Hà Minh Hòa, “Bàn về chuyển độ cao geoid thành độ cao quasigeoid”, Tạp chí Khoa học Đo đạc và Bản đồ,43,1-6, 2020.
[9] Weikko Aleksanteri Heiskanen và Helmut Moritz, “Physical geodesy”, W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, pp. 364, 1967.
[10] Nguyễn Trọng Phúc, “Địa lý tự nhiên Việt Nam”, NXB Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội, 2020.
[11] Trần Đức Thạnh, “Địa lý Việt Nam – Tự nhiên và tài nguyên”, NXB Giáo dục Việt Nam, 2018.
[12] Wei Liang, Jiancheng Li, Xinyu Xu, Shengjun Zhang, Yongqi Zhao, “A High-Resolution Earth’s Gravity Field Model SGG-UGM-2 from GOCE, GRACE, Satellite Altimetry, and EGM2008”, Engineering, Volume 6, Issue 8, P. 860-878,ISSN 2095-8099, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.05.008.
[13] E. Sinem Ince, Franz Barthelmes, Sven Reißland, Kirsten Elger, Christoph Förste, Frank Flechtner and Harald Schuh, “ICGEM - 15 years of successful collection and distribution of global gravitational models, associated services, and future plans”, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 647-674, 2019. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-647-2019.
[14] NIMA, “Department of Defense World Geodetic System 1984”, National Imagery and Mapping Agency, America, 2000.
[15] Phạm Văn Tuyên, “Nghiên cứu giải pháp nâng cao độ chính xác xác định dị thường trọng lực bằng số liệu đo cao vệ tinh trên vùng biển Vịnh Bắc Bộ - Việt Nam”, Luận án tiến sĩ kỹ thuật, Trường Đại học Mỏ - Địa chất, 2023.
[16] ICGEM, https://icgem.gfz-potsdam.de/home
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
CC 4.0
